Sunday January 7, 3:11 AM
Markets misread US strong dollar policy -Feldstein
CHICAGO, Jan 6 (Reuters) - A misunderstanding by financial
markets of the so-called "strong dollar" mantra preached by
U.S. officials is helping keep the U.S. currency overpriced and
contributing to bloated external deficits, Harvard University
economist Martin Feldstein said on Saturday.
Speaking on a panel on the U.S. current account deficit at
the Allied Social Sciences Conventions, Feldstein outlined
several factors that are holding the dollar at an overly high,
and unsustainable, level.
Repeated statements by U.S. officials in support of a
strong dollar "are a nice slogan, but that's all it is," said
Feldstein, who is also head of the private National Bureau of
Economic Research.
Feldstein said a correct interpretation is that "we would
like to have a strong U.S. dollar at home (helped by low
inflation rates) and a competitive dollar in the world."
Financial markets are "mislead" if they think there would
be government intervention or a shift in the Federal Reserve's
monetary policy to protect the dollar's value, he said.
"The Treasury should not advocate a decline in the dollar,
but it should not mislead the markets to think there is some
hidden support there for the currency," he said.
Feldstein said the sense that foreign investment will keep
flowing to the United States because it is still the healthiest
economy is another "error of understanding."
Most of the money now coming into the country is for debt
purchases by foreign governments, not from equity investors
attracted by fundamental strength in the U.S. economy, as was
more the case in the 1990s, he said.
Speaking on the same panel, Michael Mussa, senior fellow at
the Peterson Institute of International Economics, a leading
think-tank, said the dollar will need to depreciate
substantially, in real effective terms, probably by at least
another 20 percent over the next decade to help cut the U.S.
current account deficit in half.
The dollar has fallen in the past five years by about 15
percent on a trade-weighted basis against an index of major
trading partners. Nonetheless, Feldstein and others say it is
still overvalued.
ALFRED E. NEWMAN VS CHICKEN LITTLE
The current account is the net flow of transactions,
including goods, services and interest payments, between
countries. The U.S. deficit most recently was running at about
$900 billion a year, almost 7 percent of U.S. gross domestic
product or roughly double the peak deficit of a share of GDP
reached in the 1980s.
Many economists regard that level as unsustainable, but the
timing, trajectory and impact of any adjustment process remains
subject to vigorous debate.
Mussa said opinions on issue are typically split between
the Alfred E. Newman "What Me Worry?" school, and the Chicken
Little "The Sky is Falling" contingent.
Slashing the deficit with a weaker currency "will not be
completely smooth" but the risk of a disruptive dollar crash is
not particularly great, Mussa said.
At the same time, China's currency, the yuan, needs to
adjust more rapidly than the nominal changes made over the past
18 months, he said.
"The need for substantial appreciation of the yuan against
the dollar over the medium term is unmistakable," he said.
China, in contrast to the United States, runs a huge
current account surplus. In addition, it runs a large trade
surplus with the United States. In October, Washington reported
a record $24.4 billion trade deficit with China, 40 percent of
the total U.S. trade deficit.
Feldstein said both an increase in U.S. domestic savings,
now running at a negative rate, and a dollar decline were
necessary to wrestle the current account deficit to the mat.
"An increase in the savings rate is necessary but not
sufficient to bring about an adjustment," he said.
|